So, ChatGPT can now generate images. Big deal, right? Another AI trying to be Picasso, another existential crisis for graphic designers. But let’s not be completely cynical. OpenAI’s latest integration, “Images in ChatGPT,” powered by the GPT-4o model, promises more than just pretty pictures. It whispers of a future where AI image generation is…actually good. Or at least, less offensively bad.
The core promise? Better ‘binding’. Apparently, previous models struggled to tell a blue star from a red triangle. A truly shocking indictment of AI intelligence. This new system, we’re told, can juggle up to 20 objects without a catastrophic color/shape identity crisis. A monumental achievement, assuming you frequently need images with exactly 17 distinct geometric shapes. Text rendering is also allegedly improved. No more AI-generated gibberish masquerading as a legible label. Apparently, this took “many, many months” to perfect. One can only imagine the digital sweat and tears poured into preventing AI from misspelling “the”.
The secret sauce? Apparently, it’s all about the autoregressive approach. Forget those trendy diffusion models. Images in ChatGPT builds images sequentially, like a human (presumably a very slow, slightly robotic human) painting a masterpiece, pixel by painful pixel. This allegedly leads to better text and binding. Time will tell if it holds up against a barrage of requests for cats playing poker while quoting Nietzsche.
OpenAI trotted out the usual demos: scientific diagrams (correctly labeled!), multi-panel comics (with consistent characters!), informational posters (with accurate text!). Useful? Potentially. A replacement for actual graphic design skills? Not quite. But the ability to quickly generate a passable restaurant menu or a transparent background image for a sticker is…well, marginally less useless than previous iterations.
The AI-generated elephant in the room: safeguards. Remember the Taylor Swift deepfakes? The Grok incident with Kamala Harris? The Gemini watermark-removal fiasco? OpenAI assures us this time it’s different. No nude deepfakes, no CSAM, no blatant copyright infringement (hopefully). All images will include C2PA metadata, marking them as AI-generated. And if that fails, they have “internal tooling” to track down rogue images. Because nothing says “trustworthy” like admitting you need to police your own creation. Of course, “no system is perfect.” Which is AI-speak for “we’ll try our best, but expect some spectacular failures”.
Ultimately, the user owns the images. So, feel free to use them as you see fit, within OpenAI’s usage policies, of course. Just don’t expect to get rich selling AI-generated NFTs of cats playing poker. The market is saturated. And probably illegal.
So, is “Images in ChatGPT” a game-changer? Probably not. Is it a step in the right direction? Maybe. Will it eventually lead to Skynet? Only time (and a few million lines of code) will tell.
Leave a Reply